International Chittagong Hill Tracts Commission concerned about the
discriminatory and unconstitutional directives towards indigenous peoples: urges for
immediate cancellation
15 February, 2015, Dhaka: The International Chittagong
Hill Tracts Commission (CHTC) is deeply concerned about a Home Ministry memorandum
of January 22, 2015 (44. 00. 0000. 09. 11. 001.13-15 dated:22/01/2015) imposing
restrictions on foreigners’ visit to the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), requiring
all national-international individuals and organizations’ interaction with the indigenous
peoples to be supervised by members of local administration and Border Guard
Bangladesh (BGB) or the military, ordering the CHTC to remove the
"Commission" part of their name, making check-posts at the entrances
to CHT more active, transferring former indigenous Shanti Bahini members in
Police and Ansar outside the CHT among other matters. The Commission considers them
unconstitutional, discriminatory and in conflict with the CHT Peace Accord and calls
for the immediate cancellation of the orders.
Based on the decisions taken at a Home Ministry
meeting on January
7, this year, the 4th and 5th directives of the order consecutively that
states if a foreigner wishes to visit the CHT districts they will have to
submit an application to the Home Ministry at least a month before the intended
visit. And the Home Ministry will give permission based on positive reports of
the intelligence agencies of the ministry. Provided that foreign individual or
agencies obtain the ministry permission to visit the CHT they would have to
submit a specific schedule of the visit to the local administration and police. Also
all national-foreign individuals and organizations’ interaction with the
indigenous people will be supervised by members of local administration and BGB
or army. The decisions not only infringe the basic rights of national or
foreign citizens, they are very racist and will seriously impact the
implementation of the Peace Accord. Requiring ministry approval and BGB-Army
supervision for any meeting with the CHT adivasis while the same rule doesn’t
apply in the rest of the country is undoubtedly racist, discriminatory,
unconstitutional and tantamount to stripping individual freedom. Besides, the indigenous
families with non-indigenous and foreign members would be deprived of their
rights to family. CHTC strongly condemns these discriminatory decisions.
The 9th directive states that BGB
sector/battalion/Border Out Posts (BOP) will function on the acquired land maintaining
a friendly relations with the locals. But the conditions set in the amended CHT
District Council Act 1998 according to the Accord state that no land can be
acquired in the CHT without permission from the Hill District Council (HDC). But
the Reserved Forests in the region are not within the purview of this rule. But
it is notable that the lands for establishing BGB sector/battalion/BOP were
acquired only with the approval of district administration bypassing the HDC. The
process of acquiring more land for BGB is already underway. Apart from the Reserved
Forests, the hills and lands in CHT are common property of indigenous people according
to the traditional indigenous laws. Although the land acquired for BGB
establishments are claimed to be on Reserved Forests, in reality the lands
being acquired are those being used by the indigenous people as common lands. As
a result many indigenous people have been evicted from their homes already
while others are living in fear of eviction. The ministry order stipulating
that BGB sector/battalion/border outposts (BOP) will be established on the
acquired land maintaining a friendly relationship with the locals is a clear
violation of the amended CHT Hill District Council Act 1998. The Commission is
deeply worried at such a directive of the ministry.
In directive no. 10, check-posts
at the entrances to CHT are asked to be made more active. The Commission
observes with grave concern that there are numerous check-posts at different places
in the CHT in the name of security. But the incidents of violence against
indigenous women as well as the communal attacks have taken place within the visual
limits of those check-posts.
However, a majority of the communal attacks or
incidents of violence against women in the CHT have taken place in the vicinity
of the check-posts. For instance, recently in Bogachhari Naniachar Upazila, the
arson attacks and looting of indigenous villages occurred despite the presence
of nearby check posts and military camps. Past experiences suggest that the
check-posts that are there in the name of security, in many cases, instead of
ensuring security cause harm to the people of the CHT. Besides, when there is
no provision for establishment of check-posts at the entrance of any other
districts in the country, why there is a need for there to be such check-posts
in various places in the case of CHT remains a question.
Directive no. 11 states that measures will be taken to
carry out a phased transfer of former members of Shanti Bahini employed in
Police and Ansar outside the CHT. Given that the importance of mixed policing
has been repeatedly emphasised in order to implement the Peace Accord and
maintain law and order in the region, this decision, which clearly contradicts
the Peace Accord, has undoubtedly increased the insecurity of the people of
CHT.
Another decision undertaken at the meeting of the Home
Ministry was that UNDP will be requested to send a report about the
implementation progress and results of the 160 million USD development projects
undertaken by them in the last 10 years. It must be noted that UNDP has been
carrying out projects worth millions of dollars not just in the CHT but all
over the country. So the question remains why the projects of CHT need to be
singled out and evaluated/monitored separately.
Directive no. 3 has asked the CHT Commission to remove
the word ‘Commission’ from its name. But it has not been explained which
provision dictates that there can be no non-governmental initiative with
'Commission' attached to its name. Notably, although there have been other
‘commissions’ in the country such as the Ghatak Dalal Nirmul Committee’s Gono Todonto
Commission or Bangladesh Human Rights Commission, the Ministry has not asked
any other institution to change their names. As such, the CHTC is astonished at
the directive to rename the Commission.
It may be mentioned here that the meeting was called
on the basis of a BGB report and on the issue of ‘law and order development and
sovereignty’. According to the Peace Accord, any significant decisions
regarding the CHT must be made after consultation with the Regional Council.
However, the Regional Council was not consulted prior to the meeting. We all
want the country’s sovereignty to be protected and stability maintained in the
CHT. But the imposition of such discriminatory, racist and ethno-centric
decisions on the indigenous people of CHT in the name of law and order will
likely make an already tense situation even more complicated. This order is
also an attack on the freedom of expression of not just indigenous people but
every citizen of Bangladesh.
As such, the Chittagong Hill Tracts Commission calls
for immediate withdrawal of these discriminatory and racist decisions and gives
the following recommendations:
·
The
extremely racist and discriminatory decisions undertaken at the Home Ministry
meeting and the directives issued based on those decisions must be immediately
retracted.
·
Take
immediate steps to amend the contradictory clauses of the CHT Land Dispute
Resolution Commission Act and ensure that the newly-appointed chairman takes
impartial and effective steps to resolve the land disputes in order to create
and enabling environment to establish the just rights of the indigenous people.
·
Declare
a clear timeline for the full implementation of the CHT Accord.
On behalf of the CHT Commission,
Eric Avebury Sultana
Kamal Elsa
Stamatopoulou
Co-chair of the Co-chair
of the Co-chair
of the
CHT Commission CHT
Commission CHT
Commission
Members: Shapan Adnan, Lars Anders Baer, Tone Bleie, Hurst Hannum,
Yasmeen Haque, Sara Hossain, Zafar Iqbal, Myrna Cunningham Kain, Khushi Kabir,
Michael van Walt van Praag, Iftekharuzzaman.
Adviser: Jenneke Arens, Tom Eskildsen, Meghna Guhathakurta.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.